-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of Frank
Ellermann
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 8:58 AM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF test suite
Scott Kitterman wrote:
Among my favorite is an IP address after an a or mx
mechanism. It's not an error
Actually it is, <domain-spec> ends with either <toplabel>
or <macro-expand>.
In both cases there's more than only digits: A <toplabel>
starts with ALPHA, and a <macro-expand> starts with "%{".
there is no TLD for .123 (or whatever).
Hidden in domain-end = ( "." toplabel ) / macro-expand
John specified it in 3696 among others, and he's supposed
to know what follies ICANN plans, he was the IETF liaison
in (on ? at ? lang=en-DE ;-) the ICANN board.
I raise a warning on that kind of thing now.
Okay, but in that case it's also a real error. Bye, Frank
Cool. Then that's one that pySPF doesn't currently catch. More code to
write.
I wonder, do any implementations catch that one now?
Scott K