Hector Santos wrote:
What is the result for this HARD NEUTRAL?
The result is RTFM ;-) Wayne admitted that "include" is a
bad name. But "we" (IIRC Julian and Mark) managed to replace
"prefix" by "qualifier", + - ? ~ are now called qualifiers.
If an "include" internally results in PASS, it matches. The
final result is then the qualifier of the include. And yes,
-include:b.example can make sense for Greg's "include:not.me"
If the include internally results in (SOFT)FAIL or NEUTRAL
it doesn't match, then ignore it and continue left-to-right.
If the include throws an error (or is a dangling pointer to
a non-existing policy, internal NONE), the final result is
an error (TempError or PermError).
Again, please RTFM. Yes, it's long and all, but I think you
have good ideas how to twist the rules. For that you first
need to know them... ;-)
Bye, Frank
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com