spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [OT]Calling Hector Santos

2005-08-26 15:19:30
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hector Santos wrote:
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "wayne" <wayne(_at_)schlitt(_dot_)net>

domain_a:  v=spf1 ?include:domain_b -all
domain_b:  v=spf1 -ip4:1.2.3.4 +all


Right, which means MATCHING can only return PASS or FAIL and nothing else for 
a INCLUDE.  I had another example that illustrated that, change domain_b to:

No. The only meaningful result from an include:ed SPF record is PASS.
Anything else is a non-match and evaluation proceeds to the next mechanism.

    domain_b:  v=spf1 ?ip4:1.2.3.4 +all

and there is a MATCH for the ?ip4. 

What is the result for this HARD NEUTRAL?


As the other example. FAIL from "-all" since ?ip4:1.2.3.4 doesn't result
in a PASS. Any other IP would yield a NEUTRAL result since it matched
with a PASS on the include:. Domain_a never generates a PASS from its
SPF record since it has no + prefixed mechanisms.

NEUTRAL==NONE. It can only be returned from the top SPF record.

- --
Daniel Taylor          VP Operations            Vocal Laboratories, Inc.
dtaylor(_at_)vocalabs(_dot_)com   http://www.vocalabs.com/        
(952)941-6580x203
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD4DBQFDD5VH8/QSptFdBtURAmu1AJEBwYPYUdvWhH+ShNN9NwUKJqC7AJ9hoUdr
QsATn878a2tbytD3F68E4g==
=JzQ1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com