-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
And I wasn't speaking of the recievers forwarding set up -- that is
irrelevant. I'm talking about the one or more forwarders in the middle
that don't deploy SPF because of its issues. Those hops are forwarding
mail and understand their forwarding configuration just fine -- though
it is visible to neither the sending admin or the final receiving
admin.
Really, I have never heard of a forwarding that has neither been set up by
the sender nor by the recipient. SMTP isn't like IP where packets travel
through faceless 3rd-party hops on their way from the sender to the
recipient.
The "someone set up a forwarding for her" case you mentioned is extremely
obscure and is really just a case of recipient-controlled forwarding
since it was done with at least _implicit_ approval of the recipient.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDJYtMwL7PKlBZWjsRAviiAJwMP6SHDRV4cKnTEWIDZPCqSq3pFACglHqm
VPp4JFV+kUHhmJH1A+7dUWQ=
=Xblz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com