On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Frank Ellermann wrote:
william(at)elan.net wrote:
I could not even understand what is being appealed
The typo wasn't a bug but a feature (in some parallel universe
far far away, in a galaxy with the beautiful number 3683 - be
careful, don't get him started about 666, xxx, or simply x ;-)
He's appealing correction of a typo? You gotto be kidding !
What possible grounds can there be for this?????
Could, somebody summarize?
The summary is included, you missed it, here's the raw version:
<http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.ltru/3953>
Our "procedural drills" here weren't completely wasted, we now
know precisely who will when write what into a note to the RfC
editor. Why consent of the authors is important, the works...
Do tell us. I'm not on ltru and I doubt there is much correlation
between this list and ltru....
--
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com