----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark" <admin(_at_)asarian-host(_dot_)net>
IMV, this is the exactly the sort of activity the "SPF COUNCIL" is sup-
pose to be the watch dogs for.
You heard the hysteria... Now the facts from your SPF Council:
Mail::SPF::Query does NOT, by default, enable the 'best guess'
mechanism. Let me repeat that: NOT. And shouting real hard about
it does not make it so, either
Nor did I say it was or not. It doesn't matter either way.
The issue is that this non-standard feature CHANGES the meaning of a
standard SPF specification. It should not CHANGE the meaning of PASS. A
SPF NONE is a SPF NONE, not a SPF PASS.
Is this a difficult concept to grasp?
--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com