spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Nominations for the Election Officer

2006-01-05 19:24:43
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Frank Ellermann wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
A person can be nominated for both election officer and
council candidate, but can only accept for one of them.

AFAIK you're the only one who knows this CIVS magic at the moment, is
that going to be a practical problem ?  Or does it only take a couple of
hours of free time plus "common sense" to manage that ?

Operating CIVS is trivial, it only takes a few clicks and copy/pastes.  
That's one of the main reasons I pushed for it.  It has all the nice 
properties of ranked Condorcet voting while still being extremely easy to 
operate.

There's one thing which the election officer might want to do himself that 
requires some basic Linux command-line operations: setting up the voter 
registration on the SPF website for this particular election and then 
retrieving the list of registered voters for entry into CIVS.

This handful of steps can be learned in a few minutes, too, though.  I 
could even babysit the election officer when he's doing them.  (Yes, a 
web-based interface for admins, not just for end-users AKA voters, would 
be more appropriate, but... lack of time and stuff, you know?)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDvdS/wL7PKlBZWjsRAlIjAJ9YroHCvNMpw0xwHTn7+jzrPmWQwgCfZQvm
RIEWRVzoLIQzzbxE2Pnh1hA=
=faRe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com