spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] How can one alert domain admins of broken spf records

2006-06-08 07:42:34
On Thursday 08 June 2006 10:16, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:

I disagree.  Once you have correctly arrived at the SPF result
specified by the sender (PASS,NEUTRAL,SOFTFAIL,etc), you are SPF compliant.
What you do with the email is your local receiver policy, and is
independent of SPF (and hopefully depends on many factors).  The stated
goal of SPF is to eventually evolve to a situation where NONE and NEUTRAL
*are* commonly rejected.  This is just not practical at present.

I reject on NEUTRAL for a handful of domains ...

Stuart, while I think you are doing the right thing technically for your 
situation, I believe it is incorrect to characterize this approach as 
compliant.  While almost all receiver policy that was in the earlier specs 
has been removed from the final RFC, you are tripping over one of the few 
exceptions:

Paragraph 2.5.2 of RFC 4408 says, "A "Neutral" result MUST be treated exactly 
like the "None" result; the distinction exists only for informational 
purposes."

So, while your approach works (and I agree it's reasonable), it is NOT 
consistent with a MUST in RFC 4408.

Scott K

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>