-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Wayne Schlitt wrote:
See the second session, page 3 in the PDF, bottom right slide:
http://www.emailauthentication.org/summit2006/pdfs/2_Summit_Scorecard_final.pdf
Slide 4 on page 1:
| * You need:
| * Good mechanics
| (ie: authors of DKIM and SIDF)
Who are the authors of "SIDF"? WTF??
Microsoft, you gnomes, this is plagiarism!
Yes, I know Meng is officially a co-author of Sender ID. But saying
"authors of SIDF" disregards all the contributions of the SPF community!
Compare RFC 4406, section 8, to RFC 4408, section 11. The _least_ they
would have to do is say "authors of SIDF and SPF".
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEnQsnwL7PKlBZWjsRAiodAJ4ydRqJQAKbY/gbgRq8eQWXCRlKmwCgi6/T
5MXjlY7wlhNIk3aLg1aX7iE=
=RGuE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com