----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven F Siirila" <sfs(_at_)tc(_dot_)umn(_dot_)edu>
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Per/user policies in "Large Domains" (was Fixing
Forwarding with RPF)
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 12:18:04PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Thursday 16 November 2006 11:13, K.J. Petrie wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 November 2006 23:43, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > You also need to think about how to handle multi-recipient messages.
>
> Sorry, I don't see the connection. My original RPF proposal would have
> had
> a huge problem with those, which was one of the reasons for ditching it
> in
> favour of per/user configuration, but I can't see how setting policies
> for
> one recipient could possibly affect or be affected by what other
> recipients
> do.
Go look at RFC 2821 and show me how to reject the message for one
recipient
and accept it for another?
Perhaps I'm missing something here, but we do exactly this by simply
returning 2xx to some RCPT TO while returning 4xx or 5xx to others, all
based on the recipient's mail control settings in our directory.
Scott K
Yes you are missing something.... Scott Kitterman was referring to
rejecting an email based upon its content, and thus only after the DATA
phase of the email.
Michael Breton
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735