On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 09:29:32 +0100 "Alex van den Bogaerdt"
<alex(_at_)ergens(_dot_)op(_dot_)het(_dot_)net> wrote:
...
The standard should IMHO acknowledge the current install base from the
experiment which was conducted. But that's just it: an experiment, which
was
useful, and which should end.
...
SPF is not an experimental protocol. The "experiment" was an IETF method
to not have to sort out the conflicts between SPF and Sender ID for a few
years in the hope the mess would just go away.
I don't mind going to the IESG with the results of the "experiment", but
let's not be confused ourselves.
Scott K
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com