SPF Discuss (date)
January 24, 2009
- Re: Re[2]: [spf-discuss] back to Reclassifying Sender ID and SPF as Historic - was: New SPF Council, Don Lee, 18:36
- Re: Re[2]: [spf-discuss] back to Reclassifying Sender ID and SPF as Historic - was: New SPF Council, WebMaster, 15:13
- Re: Re[2]: [spf-discuss] back to Reclassifying Sender ID and SPF as Historic - was: New SPF Council, Scott Kitterman, 14:20
- Re: Re[2]: [spf-discuss] back to Reclassifying Sender ID and SPF as Historic - was: New SPF Council, alan, 13:19
- Re: Re[2]: [spf-discuss] back to Reclassifying Sender ID and SPF as Historic - was: New SPF Council, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 10:34
- Re: Re[2]: [spf-discuss] back to Reclassifying Sender ID and SPF as Historic - was: New SPF Council, Scott Kitterman, 09:53
- Re: Re[2]: [spf-discuss] back to Reclassifying Sender ID and SPF as Historic - was: New SPF Council, Scott Kitterman, 09:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] back to Reclassifying Sender ID and SPF as Historic - was: New SPF Council, Alessandro Vesely, 06:42
- Re: Re[2]: [spf-discuss] back to Reclassifying Sender ID and SPF as Historic - was: New SPF Council, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 03:32
January 21, 2009
- Re: Re: [spf-discuss] New SPF Council - was Reclassifying Sender ID and SPF as Historic, Scott Kitterman, 12:35
- Re: Re: [spf-discuss] New SPF Council - was Reclassifying Sender ID and SPF as Historic, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 12:01
- Re: Re: [spf-discuss] New SPF Council - was Reclassifying Sender ID and SPF as Historic, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] back to Reclassifying Sender ID and SPF as Historic - was: New SPF Council, Alessandro Vesely, 07:56
- Re: Re: [spf-discuss] New SPF Council - was Reclassifying Sender ID and SPF as Historic, alan, 02:15
January 20, 2009
- Re[2]: [spf-discuss] back to Reclassifying Sender ID and SPF as Historic - was: New SPF Council, WebMaster, 18:59
- Re: Re[2]: [spf-discuss] back to Reclassifying Sender ID and SPF as Historic - was: New SPF Council, Scott Kitterman, 16:23
- Re[2]: [spf-discuss] back to Reclassifying Sender ID and SPF as Historic - was: New SPF Council, Sanford Whiteman, 15:18
- Re: [spf-discuss] back to Reclassifying Sender ID and SPF as Historic - was: New SPF Council, WebMaster, 13:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] back to Reclassifying Sender ID and SPF as Historic - was: New SPF Council, Alessandro Vesely, 12:12
- Re: [spf-discuss] Worthiness of SPF by scope: helo, mfrom, and pra, Scott Kitterman, 09:32
- Re: [spf-discuss] back to Reclassifying Sender ID and SPF as Historic - was: New SPF Council, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:25
- Re: Re: [spf-discuss] New SPF Council - was Reclassifying Sender ID and SPF as Historic, alan, 08:34
- [spf-discuss] Re: Worthiness of SPF by scope: helo, mfrom, and pra, alan, 08:18
- [spf-discuss] Worthiness of SPF by scope: helo, mfrom, and pra, Alessandro Vesely, 05:43
January 12, 2009
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:33
- Re[2]: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Sanford Whiteman, 12:21
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Scott Kitterman, 12:15
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Scott Kitterman, 12:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Alessandro Vesely, 12:05
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Scott Kitterman, 12:05
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, David MacQuigg, 11:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Interim report (was: SPF on HELO - take 2), Alessandro Vesely, 06:25
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Ian Eiloart, 05:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Don Lee, 04:02
January 09, 2009
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, WebMaster, 19:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Don Lee, 18:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, David MacQuigg, 16:28
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Scott Kitterman, 15:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:05
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, David MacQuigg, 13:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Scott Kitterman, 13:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Don Lee, 13:05
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Scott Kitterman, 12:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, David MacQuigg, 11:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Alessandro Vesely, 10:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Scott Kitterman, 10:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Alessandro Vesely, 10:07
January 08, 2009
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Hector Santos, 22:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:39
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Don Lee, 13:28
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Don Lee, 13:18
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Alessandro Vesely, 12:49
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Scott Kitterman, 10:13
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Alessandro Vesely, 09:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Scott Kitterman, 08:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Alessandro Vesely, 07:48
January 07, 2009
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Scott Kitterman, 18:49
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Don Lee, 17:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Stuart D. Gathman, 16:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO - take 2, Don Lee, 14:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO, Scott Kitterman, 09:51
- Re: [spf-discuss] Definition of Forwarding, David MacQuigg, 08:01
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO, Alessandro Vesely, 07:39
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO, Scott Kitterman, 06:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF on HELO, Alessandro Vesely, 06:23