On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 06:25:40 -0600, Dimitre Novatchev
<dnovatchev(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Once we have an implementation of a library of XSLT functions, one
would simply use the compiled version of FXSL or whatever else.
Can you expand what you mean by this? Are you referring to a stand-alone
FXSL processor/library (that's how I immediately interpreted this, so
thought it best to clarify)
--
/M:D
M. David Peterson
http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 |
http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--