On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 08:15 +0000, G. T. Stresen-Reuter wrote:
Interesting and kind of sorry to hear it.
On Nov 1, 2013, at 2:45 AM, Liam R E Quin <liam(_at_)w3(_dot_)org> wrote:
Very small. We were down to three people in Working Group teleconference
calls, and that was on a good day.
The answer is probably for people to invest in CSS, not XSL-FO, these
days.
I use XSL for transforming XML into a variety of other formats
(usually XML but sometimes plain text or CSV).
I am guessing you mean XSLT, not XSL-FO.
Why do you say people should be investing in CSS, not XSL-FO? How is
this related to XSL?
XSL is in two parts, transformation and formatting.
XSLT is the transformation part.
XSL-FO is the formatting/styling part.
XSLT development is active and continuing.
XSL-FO development is less active.
Hope this helps,
Liam
--
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--