Dear Quin
> The answer is probably for people to invest in CSS, not XSL-FO, these
days.
> XSLT development is active and continuing.
> XSL-FO development is less active.
Here are several questions.
1. Did W3C determine to discontinue developing XSL-FO 2.0 for the feature?
2. What is the main cause that XSL-FO 2.0
(http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-xslfo20-20120117/) has been failed?
3. I beleive that XSL-FO is most suitable techinology for formatting XML
documents. Does CSS techinology become the complete alternative of the
XSL-FO?
Regards,
--
/*--------------------------------------------------
Toshihiko Makita
Development Group. Antenna House, Inc. Ina Branch
E-Mail tmakita(_at_)antenna(_dot_)co(_dot_)jp
8077-1 Horikita Minamiminowa Vil. Kamiina Co.
Nagano Pref. 399-4511 Japan
Tel +81-265-76-9300 Fax +81-265-78-1668
Web site:
http://www.antenna.co.jp/
http://www.antennahouse.com/
--------------------------------------------------*/
(2013/11/02 14:10),
xsl-list-digest-help(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com wrote:
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 04:21:12 -0400 To:
xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com From: Liam R E Quin <liam(_at_)w3(_dot_)org>
Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0? Message-ID:
<1383294072(_dot_)12526(_dot_)107(_dot_)camel(_at_)slave(_dot_)barefootcomputing(_dot_)com> On Fri,
2013-11-01 at 08:15 +0000, G. T. Stresen-Reuter wrote:
Interesting and kind of sorry to hear it.
On Nov 1, 2013, at 2:45 AM, Liam R E Quin <liam(_at_)w3(_dot_)org> wrote:
Very small. We were down to three people in Working Group teleconference
calls, and that was on a good day.
The answer is probably for people to invest in CSS, not XSL-FO, these
days.
I use XSL for transforming XML into a variety of other formats
(usually XML but sometimes plain text or CSV).
I am guessing you mean XSLT, not XSL-FO.
Why do you say people should be investing in CSS, not XSL-FO? How is
this related to XSL?
XSL is in two parts, transformation and formatting.
XSLT is the transformation part.
XSL-FO is the formatting/styling part.
XSLT development is active and continuing.
XSL-FO development is less active.
Hope this helps,
Liam
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--