xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0?

2013-11-02 03:02:09
On 02/11/13 07:23, Toshihiko Makita wrote:
Dear Quin

 > The answer is probably for people to invest in CSS, not XSL-FO, these
days.
 > XSLT development is active and continuing.
 > XSL-FO development is less active.

Here are several questions.

1. Did W3C determine to discontinue developing XSL-FO 2.0 for the feature?

Insufficient support from W3C members.


2. What is the main cause that XSL-FO 2.0
(http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-xslfo20-20120117/) has been failed?

I don't think it did 'fail'.

3. I beleive that XSL-FO is most suitable techinology for formatting XML
documents. Does CSS techinology become the complete alternative of the
XSL-FO?

Not yet is the honest answer. Watch the CSS space for developments,
or join W3C and help development in that direction. There's a long way to go.




regards

--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>