On 02/11/13 07:23, Toshihiko Makita wrote:
Dear Quin
> The answer is probably for people to invest in CSS, not XSL-FO, these
days.
> XSLT development is active and continuing.
> XSL-FO development is less active.
Here are several questions.
1. Did W3C determine to discontinue developing XSL-FO 2.0 for the feature?
Insufficient support from W3C members.
2. What is the main cause that XSL-FO 2.0
(http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-xslfo20-20120117/) has been failed?
I don't think it did 'fail'.
3. I beleive that XSL-FO is most suitable techinology for formatting XML
documents. Does CSS techinology become the complete alternative of the
XSL-FO?
Not yet is the honest answer. Watch the CSS space for developments,
or join W3C and help development in that direction. There's a long way
to go.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--