Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers

Sorry if I wasn't clear.  Nathaniel's proposal sounds like the right one,
specifically because it can be ignored and most of the other ones can not.

It also has the advantage of guaranteeing a common format for the information,
so even if the other end can't grok the character set of the `real' stuff it
can always revert to the USASCII.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Craig_Everhart Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Bob Smart Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Ned Freed, Postmaster Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Greg Vaudreuil Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Mark Crispin Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Greg Vaudreuil Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Mark Crispin Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Greg Vaudreuil Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Mark Crispin <= Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Bob Smart Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Ned Freed, Postmaster Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Ned Freed, Postmaster Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Ned Freed, Postmaster Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Erik M. van der Poel Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Alain FONTAINE (Postmaster - NAD) Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers, atkinson