Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME

I'd agree that the sensitivity of MIME to the existence and preservation
of the additional leading CRLF in a message is silly and I'm glad to see
it go.

I'd also argue that it is important to remove this restriction in the
interest of transport-transparency, as I'm sure that there are MTAs out
there that dink around with the leading edge of the body portion of an
RFC 822 message, adding or deleting ``superfluous'' characters.

                Craig

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, Neil Katin Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, Jim Knowles Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, Ned Freed Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, Mark Crispin Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, Ned Freed Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, Mark Crispin Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, Jim Knowles Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, Ned Freed Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, Mark Crispin Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, Craig_Everhart <= Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, Marshall Rose Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, Mark Crispin Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, Marshall Rose Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, Mark Crispin Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, Marshall Rose Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, Mark Crispin Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, John C Klensin Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, Marshall Rose Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, Mark Crispin Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, John C Klensin

Previous by Date:	Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, Mark Crispin
Next by Date:	Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, Marshall Rose
Previous by Thread:	Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, Mark Crispin
Next by Thread:	Re: MAJOR BUG IN MIME, Marshall Rose
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]