Re: language tags

Dana S Emery writes:

keith moore >  [is ISO 639/1967 sufficient]

It must minimally distinguish of C/J/K/T (traditional, or taiwanese chinese),
are all 4 provided distinct codes?


No, there is no Taiwanese/traditional Chinese code

By the way, the technical contents of ISO 639 (1988) is available
in dkuug.dk:i18n/ISO_639

Keld

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: language tags, Walt Daniels Re: language tags, John C Klensin Re: language tags, Beast (Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd) Re: language tags, Liam R. E. Quin Re: language tags, Erik M. van der Poel Re: language tags, Dana S Emery Re: language tags, Keld J\|rn Simonsen Re: language tags, Dana S Emery Re: language tags, Keld J\|rn Simonsen <= Re: language tags, Masataka Ohta Re: language tags, Dana S Emery Re: language tags, Masataka Ohta Re: language tags, Richard Rodgers Re: language tags, Masataka Ohta Re: language tags, Erik M. van der Poel Re: language tags, Keld J\|rn Simonsen Re: language tags, David Herron Re: language tags, Keld J\|rn Simonsen

Previous by Date:	Re: Language tags and 10646, Liam R. E. Quin
Next by Date:	Re: language tags, Masataka Ohta
Previous by Thread:	Re: language tags, Dana S Emery
Next by Thread:	Re: language tags, Masataka Ohta
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]