Re: MoreOn: Attempts at establishing harmful conventions
2004-11-30 17:33:41
I think we need to distinguish between human-level conventions and
protocol elements. Any "harmfulness" in the former is not something
that can be addressed technically. [...]
I dislike intermediaries that modify the subject line. Otherwise, I'm
substantially in agreement with your message.
and if we start asking users to fill in multiple fields that are
descriptive of the messages they send - one for the topic, another for
message attributes (reply, forward, confidential, etc) the instructions
for trying to get users to "do the right thing" with those fields are
going to look as if Lewis Carroll wrote them.
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Attempts at establishing harmful conventions, (continued)
- Re: Attempts at establishing harmful conventions, Bruce Lilly
- Re: Attempts at establishing harmful conventions, Keith Moore
- MoreOn: Attempts at establishing harmful conventions, Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: MoreOn: Attempts at establishing harmful conventions,
Keith Moore <=
- Company-Confidential indication, Bruce Lilly
- Re: Company-Confidential indication, Keith Moore
- Re: MoreOn: Attempts at establishing harmful conventions, Steve Dorner
- Re: MoreOn: Attempts at establishing harmful conventions, Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: MoreOn: Attempts at establishing harmful conventions, Keith Moore
- MoreOn: Re: MoreOn: Attempts at establishing harmful conventions, Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: MoreOn: Re: MoreOn: Attempts at establishing harmful conventions, Keith Moore
- Re: MoreOn: Attempts at establishing harmful conventions, Keith Moore
- Re: MoreOn: Attempts at establishing harmful conventions, Steve Dorner
- Re: MoreOn: Attempts at establishing harmful conventions, Keith Moore
|
|
|