we can certainly avoid it by not using this scheme.
Fine. What do you suggest instead?
I suggest we stop trying to decide which scheme to use, and try to
confine our immediate activitiy to
People already use a lot more
brute-force approaches with a lot worse side-effects, so I think you
are simply being disagreeable.
That's true, but forcing any kind of detectable behaviour onto
spammers is a good thing.
not if it's a waste of effort.
It's not a waste of effort even if it only reduces bandwidth from
bounced message bodies.
--
David.
--
"Of course the people don't want war. But after all it is the leaders
of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple
matter to drag the people along. All you have to do is tell them they
are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism
and exposing the country to danger... It works the same way in any
country."
- Hermann Goering, Nuremburg, 1947.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg