On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 19:43:42 +0000
Adam Back <adam(_at_)cypherspace(_dot_)org> wrote:
To avoid the trend of people only airing negative opinions, let me say
that I think Brad's narrow content-neutral unsolicited high volume
definition to be spot-on. We really must avoid solutions which reduce
functionality, reliability and freedoms of email.
I don't agree with the spam definition, but am very much in agreement
with the "do no damage" principle.
Keith
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg