On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:10:14 -0700 (MST) Vernon Schryver wrote:
+------------------
| > From: Keith Moore <moore(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu>
|
| > ... The main problem I see is the lack of any way to make senders
| > accountable for their actions, and to distinguish responsible
| > senders from irresponsible ones.
|
| exactly. That statement belongs somewhere in the problem statement
| that seems to part of the nominal purpose of this mailing list.
+------------------
The main problem with Keith Moore's statement is that it provides no
insight about what to take action against. Todate all anti-spam
technology has been implemented on behalf of the recipient. It seems
like it will be impossible to impose a motivation on the sender without
totally changing what we mean when we say email.
It might be a resonable strategic position to re-archetect email along
lines that enable enforcement of sender responsability. But that is not
a tactical solution available to us in the short term.
As such that Mr Moore's statement belongs in the overview, scope or
concusion sections of any formal statement of a goals document for
this group.
--
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg