Re: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering

> > it's fine with me if you declare it spam for your purposes, as long
> > as you don't insist that it be spam for everyone else's purposes.
> I think the definition should be 'unwanted by the recipient'. 
works for me.  but if we can't all agree on this, let's just use more
precise terms and get on with more substantive issues...

Keith
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg