On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 07:51:19PM -0400, waltdnes(_at_)waltdnes(_dot_)org
wrote:
Wouldn't it be simpler all around for plain, simple, rDNS to return
xx.1.2.18.residential.bad.example.com ? Parse the rDNS name rather than
a TXT record.
Yes! And I always wished they would adopt RFC2317 style naming for their
otherwise informationbare naming scheme. As their WHOIS services are
broken most of the time or referrals don't work this would help enormously
when setting up blocks in DNSBLs ;-))
Instead of
10-0-0-14.dyn.example.com [10.0.0.14]
it would help if it looked like
14.0/27.0.10.dyn.example.com
or even
14-0/27-0-10.dyn.example.com
\Maex
--
SpaceNet AG | Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Fon: +49 (89) 32356-0
Research & Development | D-80807 Muenchen | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299
"The security, stability and reliability of a computer system is reciprocally
proportional to the amount of vacuity between the ears of the admin"
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg