Re: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response

Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:

I think that it would be OK to require ISPs to get consent fromthe end user.


The end-user consents by not moving to another ISP.

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [Asrg] Spooked mail addresses, (continued) Re: [Asrg] Spooked mail addresses, Alan DeKok Re: [Asrg] Spooked mail addresses, Seth Breidbart Re: [Asrg] Spooked mail addresses, Alan DeKok Re: [Asrg] Spooked mail addresses, Seth Breidbart Re: [Asrg] Spooked mail addresses, Alan DeKok Re: [Asrg] Spooked mail addresses, Jon Kyme Re: [Asrg] Spoofed mail addresses; envelope and header addresses !=, Matthew Elvey Message not available RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Andreas Saurwein RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Tom Thomson Message not available RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Mark Baugher Re: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Roger B.A. Klorese <= RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Message not available RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Andreas Saurwein Re: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Seth Breidbart Re: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Andreas Saurwein RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Chris RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Andreas Saurwein [Asrg] 3a. Requirements - User Needs, Yakov Shafranovich RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Eric D. Williams Re: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Paul Tenny RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Bob Atkinson