John Levine wrote:
IMHO any "IFUSSP" solution would probably need to meet the following
requirements..
This is a nice list. Any chance you could work it up into a draft of
proposed criteria for anti-spam techniques?
I like the list, too. It has promise as a vehicle for constructive discussion
about proposals.
Perhaps the most difficult aspect of trying to flesh the list out is to provide
solid explanations that clarify and justify each of these "requirements".
Barry's response highlights this.
For example, the "no cost" requirements prompted his observing that there is
always cost. He's right, but I suspect your"no cost" reference was not meant as
an absolute. Or perhaps it was, at least, meant to mean that there was no
third-party fee. Or perhaps it meant...
Hence the need for elaborations.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
<http://bbiw.net>
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg