Danny Angus wrote:
1/ a small number of extremely well thought out and
intelligent proposals which are being suffocated by
attemptsto assert some form of commercial control over
them and a lack of cooperation.
E.G. Senderid, SPF, DomainKeys, etc
You can use these three examples right now, at least SPF
and PRA (the part of SenderID not already covered by SPF)
are "ready" (= in the RFC editor queue), you're not forced
to wait for a proper RFC number.
But please read and understand the caveats as published in
<http://www.ietf.org/IESG/APPEALS/?C=M&O=D>
The DKIM WG was chartered a few days ago, for more info see
<http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dkim>
Spam is not just an ICT problem it is a social problem.
Yes. But there's definitely a design flaw in post-821 SMTP
as far as most SPF FAIL friends are concerned. That's of
course highly controversial, many others claim that it's a
feature.
That's where we enter the deep waters of financial interests.
Parts of the anti-spam industry might not like it if big
chunks of "the problem" are removed, because "the problem"
is their business concept.
Bye, Frank
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg