Matthew Sullivan apologized:
Matthew Sullivan wrote:
Creating a document that mandates or indicates operation other than
how
the *current* DNSbls operate will make the draft pointless as it will
be ignored and the DNSbl operator will say that they are not going
to
change their policy for a bunch of people with no clue about real
life
operation of DNSBls.
Sorry, that's a pre coffee mail - so could have been worded a lot more
tactfully, but my point is very clear I think.
Given that you're one of the handful of current DNSBL operators
participating in this conversation, do you feel that the document (with
the changes Chris is working on) is acceptable?
If credentials are necessary, here are some of mine:
- product manager at MAPS, 2000-2001
- designed Hotmail's internal BL while working there 2001-2004
- worked on Yahoo!'s internal lists (of all colors) 2004-2007
- regular speaker on reputation theory & practice at MAAWG
- currently indirectly involved with Return Path's Sender Score
Certified whitelist, and directly working on the Sender Score Blacklist
and other reputation-based products.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg