ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Asrg] New draft draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-01.txt

2008-03-31 14:47:25
Matthew Sullivan wrote:
SM wrote:
  
At 22:29 30-03-2008, Douglas Otis wrote:
  
    
This is Dave Rand again, again - I am not part of this mailing list,
and am responding via this forum simply to provide facts, figures and
current status.  I continue to be available for questions, comments
and backing data.
    
      
I gather that Dave Rand is not following the discussion as he is not 
part of the mailing list.  It's not conducive to have a discussion 
under these circumstances.
  
    


So who are you and what do you have to do with DNSbls?



  
The DNSL operator is free to have an expiration of 20 years.  This 
draft is a BCP.  It's up the operator to determine whether they wish 
to follow it or not.
  
    


Speaking as a DNSbl creator/operator/maintainer/owner I would like to 
point out that 'BCP' stands for 'Best *Current* Practices'...  I see 
little point in any BCP document that does not actually relate to the 
*CURRENT* practices whether best or not.  I would expect as a minimum 
that any document you wish to create would have input from the most used 
DNSbls in the world (at least the top 3, but I would expect in reality 
that it were the top 10 or more) and it would actually reflect their 
current practices where there is common ground. 


  
Perhaps I am mis-reading this, or perhaps I'm just confused about the
intent of the draft to insulate service providers from any requirement
of action.  If I am, I apologize to the group.  Again, I am *all for*
    
      
If there's any requirement for service providers to act upon, it 
makes adoption of the draft more difficult.
  
    



Creating a document that mandates or indicates operation other than how 
the *current* DNSbls operate will make the draft pointless as it will be 
ignored and the  DNSbl operator will say that they are not going to 
change their policy for a bunch of people with no clue about real life 
operation of DNSBls.

Regards,

Mat

  

As all that stuff for the AHBL I amplify and agree with all the points
Mat makes herein.

Andrew
AHBL.org

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>