SM wrote:
Edits are []
A document that doesn't take into account the views of DNSBL
operators is pointless. I don't think that's what the author[s] of the
draft is [are] attempting to do.
It already does.
Speaking of which, we might be able to side-step such arguments by
mentioning specific DNSBLs in the "Thanks" section. I already have one
lined up if others are willing. Anybody? [Privately if you wish.]
Also: perhaps the most worrying point to some DNSBL operators is that a
document such as this could be used in an adverse manner in a court
case. I just had an idea that there could be a "DNSBL user" MUST
accepting full responsibility for all consequences of a listing, with
verbiage that they're the ones choosing to use it in a particular
manner. That would draw a few bits and pieces out of other bits of the
document (eg: "fully within their rights to list for any reason
whatsoever") into one section.
Thoughts?
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg