Dave,
Dave Crocker wrote:
A very reasonable point, though there are also counter arguments.
But that's a discussion that's not for this list which for better
or worse has to work with the current IETF custom & practice.
Stephen,
Ok. This is a pretty serious disconnect.
Sigh. The mail to which I responded had no dkim-specific content,
but was rather a generic criticism of how the IETF forms wgs.
That generic criticism is what is not for discussion here. There's
a GEN area group somewhere who'd no doubt love to have that
discussion.
Stephen.
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org