Mark Delany wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 08:49:09AM +0100, Stephen Farrell allegedly wrote:
Dave Crocker wrote:
So the choice between "teach newcomers" versus "allow those who are
already involved to collaborate" result in significant differences in
how the meeting is run. It is difficult to imagine an approach that
juggles both goals within such a short time slot.
I don't find it hard at all. We'll ask them at the start and work from
there.
So are you saying that if the majority of attendees are in need of
"newcomer training", then we'll forgo WG formation process in
preference to an educational session?
You're missing the point (and perhaps others who already want a WG are
as well). You don't have to convince yourselves. You have to convince
the people in the room (whoever that might be) to the tune of rough
consensus. That's the audience you're playing to.
Eliot
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org