Mark Delany wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 08:49:09AM +0100, Stephen Farrell allegedly wrote:
Dave Crocker wrote:
So the choice between "teach newcomers" versus "allow those who are
already involved to collaborate" result in significant differences in
how the meeting is run. It is difficult to imagine an approach that
juggles both goals within such a short time slot.
I don't find it hard at all. We'll ask them at the start and work from
there.
So are you saying that if the majority of attendees are in need of
"newcomer training", then we'll forgo WG formation process in
preference to an educational session?
Nope. I mean that we need to deal with those who are in the
room and approach our main goal a little differently if some
education is needed.
There can only be one, number one priority. Is that number one
priority, WG formation, the whim of the crowd on the day, or some
other thing?
I believe wg formation requires, amongst other things, a BoF
which results in a positive hum agreeing to the wg happening.
Stephen.
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org