ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues

2007-06-04 05:15:49


Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Sunday 03 June 2007 12:51, Eliot Lear wrote:
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Sunday 03 June 2007 11:58, Steve Atkins wrote:
... as SPF deployment is decreasing ...
I'm curious as to the basis for this statement as that's not consistent
with the statistics I've seen.
Can we please NOT have the "mine is bigger than yours" argument now?

I don't want to have an arguement. Stats are hard to come by and I'm genuinely curious. Offlist is fine.

Offlist is better since this is off topic.

We already decided NOT to include a requirement that SSP be able to
express the "nomail" practice. Let's spend the time elsewhere, where
we have issues to decide.

Stephen.

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>