Re: MX dot was (Re: [ietf-dkim] TXT wildcards SSP issues

Douglas Otis wrote:
> It is
> not clear why a "no mail sent" assertion must be excluded from a policy 
> statement.  
Well... because that was the concensus. Feel free to re-read
the archive, but basically: End of story.

S.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html