> NOMAIL is out of scope, but wildcard is in scope.
>
> The relevance here is that it looks like we can get 95% or better coverage of
the real use cases here by acknowledging that wildcards are primarily an issue for
NOMAIL.
It is? If I sign everything for my domain, I'd like to be able to say
that for both the top level domain, and all of the subdomains too,
right?
Mike
I think it is better to say, '*' means: ...and everything else.
So the subdomains that are not currently signed are covered under the '*' rule.
Which begs the question, if ~any~ subdomain is signed, wouldn't the
top level have to have to be signed even though it may be .nomail?
Regards,
Damon Sauer
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html