ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Wrong Discussion - was Why mailing lists should strip DKIM signatures

2010-04-27 14:38:05
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of McDowell, Brett
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 12:29 PM
To: dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net
Cc: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Wrong Discussion - was Why mailing lists
should strip DKIM signatures

So Murray... you mentioned you started talking to folks about this use
case at IETF 77.  Were any of them MLM vendors or service providers?

I don't think I know any MLM vendors, other than Yahoo and Google who have 
their respective MLM ("groups") services.

The parties with whom I discussed the idea were general technologists and 
specification types, just to get some idea of what some first steps might be in 
the IETF and R&D contexts.

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>