On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Dave CROCKER <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net>
wrote:
I think you are raising the (much) larger question of constraining the nature
of
changes made by MLMs. Since they [sic] are actually posting an entirely new
message,
and forging the From address
they have the legitimate freedom to do what they want to it.
is it really legitimate in today's world?
However, some can
choose to participate in that much more constrained role, looking more like a
relaying MTA than a modifying intermediary.
DKIM should be able to survive that.
ps - yes, I know this hash been hashed out many times before.
Eventually we'll all be dust and something else will prevail. :)
--
Jeff Macdonald
Ayer, MA
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html