ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Wrong Discussion - was Why mailing lists should strip DKIM signatures

2010-04-28 13:55:40
On 28/Apr/10 17:23, Dave CROCKER wrote:
On 4/28/2010 8:02 AM, MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote:
 1) [...]  policy against posting to lists using the domain in question.

 2) One possible recommendation to list managers is that if a message to
 the list is DKIM signed AND has an ADSP discardable policy AND the
 signature cannot be maintained intact then the list should bounce the
 message.

What is the particular benefit of doing this, rather than letting the 
receiving
site do the bouncing?

Force posters to obey #1
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>