ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] list vs contributor signatures, was Wrong Discussion

2010-04-28 07:37:42


--On 27 April 2010 20:43:47 +0200 Alessandro Vesely <vesely(_at_)tana(_dot_)it> 
wrote:


If you already know you trust the list, how much practical benefit is
there to the assertion?

None. But lists who don't require DKIM to accept posts may happen to
publish occasional forgeries.

BTW, are there lists that require DKIM "pass" to accept posts?

If so, their memberships must be quite restricted - unless they're 
announcement-only lists rather than discussion lists.


-- 
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
01273-873148 x3148
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>