ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] list vs contributor signatures, was Wrong Discussion

2010-04-28 12:39:02
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of John R. Levine
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 6:03 AM
To: Ian Eiloart
Cc: DKIM List
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] list vs contributor signatures, was Wrong
Discussion

Oh, sure.  For inbound mail, lists can use DKIM the same way that
anyone
else does to recognize mail from senders whose mail they want.
Subscribers might manually note that all their mail is signed, a la
Paypal, or this might be a narrow scenario where ADSP could do less
harm
than good.

In the context of authentication to an MLM, are we dancing around in the area 
of tying "d=" to "From:" again?  Or would you store in the subscriber's 
meta-data which "d=" value(s) must appear on that subscriber's postings in 
order for them to be considered authentic?

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>