On 04/29/2010 10:23 AM, Al Iverson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:58 AM, McDowell,
Brett<bmcdowell(_at_)paypal(_dot_)com> wrote:
On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:11 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
Your proposal that MLM remove Signatures would cause restrictive
policies to fail.
Which is why I oppose this proposal.
As John Levine mentioned previously, your own posts to this list fail
authentication and end up in many of our spam folders because of
Paypal's SPF policy. I'm not against strong authentication policies --
but I'm wondering how you personally expect to be able to post to
mailing lists without acceptance of this proposal? The status quo
interferes with your ability currently, and broader adoption of
authentication on the receiving side will only make it worse.
The solution to a misconfigured SPF/ADSP record is for every receiver to
patch it up post-hoc? That makes absolutely no sense.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html