ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] list vs contributor signatures, was Wrong Discussion

2010-04-29 13:54:21
On 04/29/2010 11:39 AM, Powers, Jot wrote:
What I'd advise is something like put all of your transactional mail
in a subdomain and set it to "discardable", but don't do that to all
your corpro users. There are other ways to go about this, but I'd say
that you're playing with fire lumping all your stuff together as it
appears that you're doing now.

For non-obvious reasons it would be easier to do it the other way.
Make corp come from a subdomain and change the policy there and
keep transactional as paypal.com.

Heh, I figured the way I described would be the easier route :)


The politics of that are something I'll leave to Brett.

Or you can just do what a lot of people do which is to tell users of
external lists not to post from their corpro accounts :)

Head-in the sand is always appealing.  :)

I'm not so sure this really isn't a viable strategy, honestly. I notice on
NANOG in particular that most people don't post from their corpro account,
seemingly to keep a bit of distance between the geek line and corpro line.
It's not like it's hard to get email accounts these days unlike the dawn of
time when most of us cut our teeth. I can't think of any other pathological
cases like mailing lists that would defeat that as a policy/strategy.

Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>