On 4/29/10 11:12 AM, "Michael Thomas" <mike(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com> scribbled:
With respect to DKIM, anybody who filters based on broken signatures without
any (or little) other input pretty much deserves the false positive rate
they're complaining about.
Ok. I think we (PayPal) are on the same page. We recognized that
DomainKeys with "o=-" and DKIM without "t=y" and ADSP with
"dkim=discardable" is likely to have some collateral damage. We
work to minimize it but believe the value in preventing phish
is worth that cost.
Not like email has ever been guaranteed delivery. ;)
-Jot
--
Jot Powers jpowers(_at_)paypal(_dot_)com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html