On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:58 AM, McDowell, Brett
<bmcdowell(_at_)paypal(_dot_)com> wrote:
On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:11 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
Your proposal that MLM remove Signatures would cause restrictive
policies to fail.
Which is why I oppose this proposal.
As John Levine mentioned previously, your own posts to this list fail
authentication and end up in many of our spam folders because of
Paypal's SPF policy. I'm not against strong authentication policies --
but I'm wondering how you personally expect to be able to post to
mailing lists without acceptance of this proposal? The status quo
interferes with your ability currently, and broader adoption of
authentication on the receiving side will only make it worse.
Apologies if this is off-topic, not germane to the broader discussion.
But this question has been nagging at me strongly these past few days.
Regards,
Al Iverson
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html