ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] list vs contributor signatures, was Wrong Discussion

2010-05-10 14:00:58
Apart from ADSP rules, a broken signature must be treated as if there was no 
signature at all. That in itself is not the problem. The problem with broken 
signatures is that people will not buy into a technology (DKIM) if it will 
not cover a significant part of their e-mail.

Of course.  That's why MLMs should sign their mail, or equvalently the MSA 
they use should sign it.  Problem solved, right?

Free bonus: MLMs can sign the list mail even if the contributor didn't 
sign it.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>