ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] list vs contributor signatures, was Wrong Discussion

2010-05-26 11:16:26
On 05/26/2010 08:55 AM, John Levine wrote:
Problem = phishing
Utility = just one sender + two mailbox providers have blocked over
100 million phishing attacks, many of those blocks also resulted in
site take-downs.

The value of what we already have from your efforts in IETF is HUGE
  for consumer protection.

I believe this is a big win for DKIM, which I hope we can tell the world
about.

It has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with ADSP, since the two mailbox
providers are (quite reasonably) treating paypal and ebay as a special
case.

NOTHING WHATSOEVER is vast overstatement; ADSP makes the "special case" 
unnecessary,
so there aren't an unmanageable number of "special cases".

And do you know for a fact that they are a "special case" still?

Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>