-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of John R. Levine
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 9:47 AM
To: Brett McDowell
Cc: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] list vs contributor signatures, was Wrong
Discussion
Steve Atkins and I have explained why that's utterly implausible enough
times that anyone who's interested can easily find it in the list
archives.
With all due respect, the two of you don't constitute "consensus", and I don't
think abruptly stifling legitimate debate like this serves the working group or
the communities we claim to serve at all.
You don't have to participate in the thought process if you find it irritating
or repetitive, but please don't try to stop others, especially new people, that
may want or need to go through it. You never know, they might have something
new and valuable to offer. Or you could swing them around to your view, which
builds consensus and only benefits you.
I've written code implementing all of this stuff, but I've never run it in an
operational environment of the size or nature that Brett does. So I want to
hear what he has to say until there's consensus to the contrary.
If you find it annoying, please just ignore or filter it.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html