ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] more on discardable, was Lists "BCP" draft

2010-05-26 23:14:22
Hi Doug,
At 14:03 26-05-10, Douglas Otis wrote:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-otis-dkim-tpa-label-03

I read that draft.  Are there any plans for an implementation?  By 
the way, the question is not to brush you off.

When the domain administration receives DSNs or MARFs indicating a 
problem, they should also be able to recognize whether it involves a 
trusted third-party service based upon content.  A third-party 
authorization method offers a practical means to extend ADSP "all" 
with a method to mitigate possible disruptions.  IMHO, "discardable" 
should be limited to domains not sending mail.

I'll stay out of the "discardable" and "all" discussion for now.

Rather than using ADSP "discardable", it would be better to a 
mandate the use of MX records.  BNAME zones will soon make the use 
of address records to discover MTAs impossible.  As such, the 
Address Record discovery should be depreciated.

I prefer not to comment. :-)

Regards,
-sm 

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>